CNW Marketing Research Inc. spent two years collecting data on the energy That’s the conclusion of long-term study of “dust to dust” energy costs for cars and . Some organization called CNW Marketing Research Inc. has published an ” analysis” of the total energy consumption of various kinds of cars. 8 This is in part because 6 Dust to Dust Rep CNW Marketing Research Inc Web 19 from ENVS at University of Oregon.
|Published (Last):||18 November 2012|
|PDF File Size:||2.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.68 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Archived from the original on Automobile energy cost – Dust to Dust report. Everyone ought to agree that the cost of a product ought to reflect its actual costs: Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion.
Automobile energy cost – Dust to Dust report | Physics Forums
One of them being that it was assumed that the entire nickel production out of Inco’s plant in Sudbury near my cottage! I have heard that they won’t even come close. Gleick’s paper pokes holes in the original study, pointing out its poor assumptions such as the usable life of a Hummer H1 35 years versus the life of a Prius 11 years. But the people waving the CNW Report banner don’t seem to be willing to follow the report to this conclusion.
FredGarvinJul 31, Aug 1, 8. The friendliest, high quality science and math community yo the planet!
Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. Everyone who loves science is here! DangerAug 1, Webarchive template wayback links Pages using deprecated image syntax Wikipedia articles needing clarification from October Your name or email address: Now the study has been well discredited in a paper titled ” Hummer versus Prius: While a Prius is one-third the weight of a Hummer and gets between four and six times better fuel economy, CNWMR argued the Hummer vehicles are built using less costly technology and are driven more over their lifetime.
CNW Research “dust to dust” study – Søren Ragsdale
Log in or Sign up. It’s not just that CNW’s comparison is wrong, it’s that the numbers themselves are wrong. I’m averaging 25, miles a year, and I doubt my car is headed to the crusher just three years from now.
They point out something that’s more or less reasonable: The trade-off gets even more favorable when you start comparing gas prices five to ten years from now. Aug 1, 9.
Then there’s what percentage of vehicles on the world’s roads are that model, which determines how much of the infrastructure costs are its responsibility.
FredGarvinAug 1, Archived from the original PDF on CNET’s best of The Ni-MH batteries most common today are rated for about recharges, which may be 8 years but I’d doubt it.
Themile figure for the Prius is truly bizarre, as many people have documented their Priuses getting dudt over dyst number.
CNWMR performed research into consumer motivations and decisions duat automotive purchases, and reports a variety of data related to market forecasting. Log in No account? CNWMRknown primarily as an automotive marketing research company, was a private company founded in Prius uses less energy too Hummer Sign in to comment Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. Maybe building a Prius does cost more energy and cause more harm than an H2.
SRodeJul 29, The transmission is six fixed gears so there’s very little to wear out. Toyota can claim what they want about the prius, but their suppliers still dump sulfur dioxide into the air to produce the batteries.
The byproducts of nickel smelting and the production of nickel foam.